Pat Gunn (dachte) wrote,
Pat Gunn
dachte

Saddling an Insane Horse

This may be uninteresting to a lot of you.

On the way to work today, I had a thought. I used to play a lot of roleplaying games with friends, or rather, I used to be the DM (the storyteller for the interactive storytelling that is RPGs). One of the systems, DnD, had 3 different primary types of supernatural powers (originally 2 -- the third was added in an afterthought and a lot of people didn't use them) that, if one made one's career one of the three, one could use. Wizards had use of magic, Clerics/Priests had use of prayers, and Psionicists had use of Psionics (mental powers). The rationale for the origin of each of these powers was decent -- magic exploited irregularities in the nature of things and tapped into latent power in the universe to create effects, prayers petitioned gods (or nature or whatever) to grant a bit of power to create effects, and psionics used mental abilities to manipulate local things (and one's body). The system wasn't particularly well thought out, but it didn't need to be -- one can easily imagine different arrangements. Druids, for example, used prayer magic with their power normally coming from the abstract concept of nature. One could easily imagine giving a more druidic spin to psionics, tying the mental powers to accepting one's role as part of nature, tweaking the powers, etc. As the system did work though, the differences between each system wasn't wide enough, and the systems mirrored each other too much. For example, Clerics and Mages (Wizards), the two oldest classes of the three powers-using ones, too often ended up having very similar abilities -- whereas a Mage might study his spells in the morning, a Cleric would spend time meditating in the morning to refresh their powers. Their process of casting spells was virtually identical, and a number of the powers themselves were duplicated between the two. Psionicists were a bit different, in that their abilities were power-pool based (they didn't need to choose what powers they'd use when they woke up for the day), and they had a chance to fail using any of their abilities. Still, they still had roughly similar sets of abilities that didn't have much in the way of systematic or principled differences from mages or clerics. Teleport? Got that. Disintegrate? Yup. Wound healing? Sure. That's disappointing. The other classes in DnD, Fighters, Thieves, Monks, Rangers, etc. all had bigger differences (especially when one gets into third edition of ADnD). Admittedly the biggest part of a good campaign is the storytelling, not the combat stats and only sometimes the abilities, but I think they still do factor in. I think it would make a lot of sense to come up with solid differences between the abilities of the 3 mystic classes and redo them based around those differences. I present the basics of such a system below:

  • Mages - Arcane Magic is based around manipulating raw forces and the nature of things, drawing on sources of magical power from elemental planes. It is a rough tool, bludgeoning reality to its will. It is not well-suited towards more refined effects, and is most suited towards powers that take place while being cast and are done afterwards. Spells that persist afterwards are at most simple autonoma, and have a good chance to go awry after any significant time. As a first step, I suggest chopping divination and illusion magic.
  • Clerics - Clerical magic is based on drawing attention and/or power from agents of abstract forces or deities towards ends aligned with common needs or philosophy with those entities. It tends to produce refined effects that are limited strictly to the spheres of power of those forces, with very little truly general-purpose role. I suggest getting rid of most general-purpose powers, making each devotion a subclass with very different abilities.
  • Psionics - Psionics are based on treating the body and universe as more controllable and less distinct than they are. Psionic powers are tied to forces and abilities linked to human and animal bodies and minds themselves. As a first step, I suggest chopping out disintegration and other powers that produce gross non-body physical effects.
  • Monks (they're not mystic classes, but in some systems they have some spells) - monk powers should be based on manipulating fighting spirit in the body to deliver different kinds of elemental forces with one's blows as part of one's aura.
Note that the biggest problem with imagining magic working in the real world is that it suggests that the Universe keep track of and consider significant a lot of things that, as far as we can tell, it does not. For example, let's imagine an arcane magic spell that would distort space, causing the landscape parts of the terrain to become twice as large but leave all non-land things (like creatures, people, their dwellings, etc) the same size. The issue in imagining such a spell is that it demands on the universe that it keep track of what is land and what is not. Implied in this is the idea that there actually must be a principled physical difference. We may imagine building a classifier (Bayesian filter?), but that borders on ludicrous for most of the spells/abilities listed in the book. Healing spells are similarly problematic -- how would one create an effect that knows what is tissue or not, what is living tissue or not, and how to extrapolate the state of healthy tissue given nonhealthy tissue. Could casting Cure Light Wounds start cancer if done improperly? A lot of real-world pseudoscience can be caught with this kind of wondering -- we can often get a decent idea if an idea is at least somewhat plausible by asking if it tells us about a universe where things have an intrinsic nature (in other words, claiming that things lie in the domain of algorithms when they at best lie in the realm of heuristics). It is amusing that the biggest objection to magic may lie in understanding issues with information and classification.
Subscribe

  • Substitute Gift

    This is the time where the more materialist of us are giving gifts and the geeky of us are giving GIFs. Instead, I offer you a year's end music mix:…

  • Clean Ears

    Weird Al recently released another another album, Alpocalypse. I've always liked his Polka medleys, but not having a TV means I don't hear much of…

  • Bohemian ID Card

    Anyone who has played Portal 2 and has a good knowledge of classical music, I have a question (might be spoily for those who have not yet played…

  • Error

    Anonymous comments are disabled in this journal

    default userpic

    Your reply will be screened

    Your IP address will be recorded 

  • 0 comments