Pat Gunn (dachte) wrote,
Pat Gunn
dachte

Linguistic Absolutism

Resolved: Will use the way words/languages evolve over time as analogy in future arguments with people who are moral absolutists. We can easily imagine linguistic absolutists who use arguments that are perfect mirrors of moral absolutists, e.g. "how will we know that Apple really means an apple unless there is an absolute language?", and perhaps seeing the arguments in that context will help moral absolutists see how ridiculous they are. Changing values on topics such as gender, slavery, etc. deserve explicit mention.

Tags: philosophy
Subscribe

  • Typing in Colours

    (Cross-posted to G+, but it's more of a definitive statement of views so it goes here too) A recent instance of 「Wasted Talent」: here I'm not…

  • Loyalty

    This is meant to address three ideas: Don't blame the victim If you care for me, you'd support me unconditionally Safe zonesAnd to be a topic in…

  • What Do We Owe Each Other?

    One of the central questions in political philosophy, or perhaps one of the most intuitive initial framings, is "what do we owe each other?". I…

  • Post a new comment

    Error

    Anonymous comments are disabled in this journal

    default userpic

    Your reply will be screened

    Your IP address will be recorded 

  • 0 comments