Pat Gunn (dachte) wrote,
Pat Gunn
dachte

Searle's Box

Classic counterargument to Searle's Chinese Box - Box as a system is intelligent even if components are not. Extend: embracing of technological enhancement, "office" of a person meaning totality of them as a social grain - PDAs, email, car, tools combined with them - interactions with them as that grain versus just the human inside. Reliance on tools as part of that larger identity of us - does it make the human inside less worthy on some level? Are we the man in Searle's box? Perhaps that's not a bad thing, provided we continually strive to make our tools harbour knowledge as deep as that specifically in the human bits.

Various patterns of thought: I read about use of diagrams to describe patterns of thought in a few books a long time ago - radial, linear, circular, etc. Wondering whether people who were considered particularly great thinkers were typically classifiable as being particularly good at one style, and whether the styles are both cohesive and defensible against other conceptualisations of the same "thought-descriptive-space". Likewise, if these categories make sense, do people tend to specialise in a certain mix of thought patterns? Does this change as people age? Linear thought versus circular thought versus free-associating thought veersus ...

Overheard at 61c - long conversation between people talking about relationships and what they want out of them. Timing in relationships: differs quite a bit - one person wanted sex right away, cohabitation after a year, and dating for 2-3 years before marriage - conversation kind of important but not really. Another would meet, also have sex right away, and marry the next day if things "felt right" - conversation fairly important. Another seemed to think sex is relatively unimportant, and social arrangement is key. I eventually joined in giving both my understanding of traditional Islam (confirmed by one of the ppl, who was a moderate Muslim) and after that moseying over to my (liberal Romantic) norms. Interesting: how differently we all thought and how our timeframes for various stages not only were different but were also not even ordered the same (e.g. getting physical, moving in, meeting family, engagement, marriage, etc). I'm also a bit weirded out that one of the people talked so openly about casual one-night stands with people he didn't know - some part of me was lightly grumbling that that's improper, but another thought that maybe it's not bad in all circumstances even for those more oriented towards romance than sex.

In theory, I should've gone to RHPS tonight, but was feeling a bit too blue and also didn't want to look for a ride. Oh well. Hopefully they're all having fun right now.

The old NES game "Adventures of Lolo" (and its two sequels) is neat - 3/4 puzzle and 1/4 action.

Subscribe

  • Sneezes while Sneaking

    I recently came across Kat Walsh (a prominent-and-awesome Wikipedian I used to know)'s Women on Wikipedia essaylet. I don't have a lot to add on…

  • The Prajna of British Anicca

    I went for the Encyclopedia Britannica's offer of free access to their online edition to web publishers (which includes frequent bloggers). As I…

  • Napes and Latters

    A few amusing things on youtube: Mary Poppins ... sort of.. The Ring ... sort of.. The Shining ... sort of.. Home Alone ... spot on..…

  • Post a new comment

    Error

    Anonymous comments are disabled in this journal

    default userpic

    Your reply will be screened

    Your IP address will be recorded 

  • 6 comments