Pat Gunn (dachte) wrote,
Pat Gunn


In any online community where there are rules and some way, official or not, honest or not, for users to help enforce or support those rules, a community will form to do so provided there is reasonable consensus that the rules are actually for the public good. This will often happen even if there is no direct benefit to those who do so (no rewards, no recognition, etc). Likewise, there will usually appear a much smaller group of people who are opposed to rules who will either rules-lawyer or (as the preacher in the following link does) be a nutjob. (To be careful with scope - sometimes particular rules don't make sense, and supporting those rules can be quite a bad thing). There's something nice about seeing spontaneous, relatively-low-ego communities form in support of good things.


  • Still alive

    Been feeling a bit nostalgic. Not about to return to LiveJournal - their new ownership is unfortunate, but I wanted to briefly note what's been up…

  • Unplugging LJ

    It's about time I pulled the plug on the LJ version of my blog: 1) I'm much more active on G+ than I am with general blogging. I post many times a…

  • Mutual Trust

    I don't know which should be considered more remarkable: That a cat should trust a member of a far larger and stronger species that it can't…

  • Post a new comment


    Anonymous comments are disabled in this journal

    default userpic

    Your reply will be screened

    Your IP address will be recorded