Pat Gunn (dachte) wrote,
Pat Gunn
dachte

Shape of the Eyes

This is qualified as a dissenting thought.

  • When may a search for wisdom (philosophy) become a search for knowledge (science)?
  • When we define and decide on on a notion of what knowledge is and how it is to be sought.
  • Can one find knowledge without looking for it?
  • One may find things that may become knowledge with reevaluation rather than search, but until we have that framework knowledge is not definitionally meaningful.
  • Is reintegration of past events as valuable in science as prediction of future ones? Are we not better off not seeking material that may be reevaluated into science?
  • Depends on the notion of science we make for a field. Each field differs a bit
Dissenting because in my main framework, I do not make this exact distinction between knowledge and wisdom, plus I consider philosophy to be a superfield that contains science.
Subscribe

  • Still alive

    Been feeling a bit nostalgic. Not about to return to LiveJournal - their new ownership is unfortunate, but I wanted to briefly note what's been up…

  • Unplugging LJ

    It's about time I pulled the plug on the LJ version of my blog: 1) I'm much more active on G+ than I am with general blogging. I post many times a…

  • Mutual Trust

    I don't know which should be considered more remarkable: That a cat should trust a member of a far larger and stronger species that it can't…

  • Post a new comment

    Error

    Anonymous comments are disabled in this journal

    default userpic

    Your reply will be screened

    Your IP address will be recorded 

  • 0 comments