Things continue to escalate in Egypt — the army is active in Cairo, but the police are not capable of controlling things; looters have visited museums to alternatively smash and steal things, while neighbourhoods have organised citizens' police to protect their stuff.
This is one of the uglier sides of human nature — while I believe that many people are truly civilised and don't need in their daily life the idea that state power will punish them for antisocial acts, there are enough people who are not so civilised who absent the immediate prospect of punishment embrace their id, smashing things for fun, seeking profit in ways societally unacceptable, raping, killing, etc. This bothers me — I find it much more curious when it occasionally comes up in debate with some religious people — "were it not for god's punishment hanging over me, I would do $HORRIBLE_THINGS". I usually charitably classify that as an argumentitive tack — I would hope that at least the habits of caring for and being good to each other are present in them and would survive the clearing of (what I consider to be) their delusions. It certainly doesn't make me respect them when I hear that though (to be fair, it is very rare that I've met moral absolutists who really understand moral relativism, and without that conceptual shift the idea is probably really scary). Still, I think one of the duties of a good society is to really civilise its people to the point where they identify with each other and their system enough that they not only don't want to do $HORRIBLE_THINGS, they have some basic desire to do $NON_SELF_CENTRED_THINGS. Why? Because we care about each other, and care about the public good.