Pat Gunn (dachte) wrote,
Pat Gunn

  • Music:

Semantics of Gears

Portal 2 came out, and I have beaten it, sustaining moderate damage to my sleep schedule. It was fantastic, and has very heavy doses of plot, well-defined characters with an interesting backstory, awesome gameplay, a heavy dose of humour, and good music. I wish it had been much, much longer, but it wasn't a short game, and in a few weeks I imagine I'll be making my way through a second, relaxed play.

OLPCs have arrived, and I'm starting to look for low-hanging fruit in terms of improving system performance/reducing the image size for the XO's sugar-ised Fedora. I'll be playing with kernel tweaks soon. One thing I've noticed about OLPC folk is that they don't have a very practical mentality. I might need to hang around a bit longer to be sure, but it feels like they're more easily swayed by deciding a person's awesome than deciding a person has a project idea that's well-defined and likely to succeed. Maybe this is appropriate for nonprofits?

In the PDF on medical ethics I finished recently, there was some British case law mentioned, where a mother sued NHS attempting to bar them from offering contraceptives to her daughters. One of the judges expressed well what I've felt for a long time; that parents don't have an unlimited right to control their children; parental custody is instituted for the benefit of the children, and if and where parents fail to do so, intervention (up to termination of custody) is sensible.

In general, I'm very comfortable with (government) social services having considerable leeway in nudging/requesting/demanding changes to parenting, under the right circumstances, and I don't believe the family should be considered sacrosanct; However, there are the high emotional costs that come from changing custody of a child. The state's obligation to serve society extends to children, and its only shyness with intervention should stem from concerns with:

  • Not knowing the deep history of a conflict or child; not knowing well all those more involved
  • Cost/time of social workers
  • Not permitting relationships of nurturing authority to develop properly due to all parties involved looking over their back
I reject the idea of families having a fundamental right to be free from intervention. In the normal course of affairs, I expect intrusive personal intervention to be limited to a few families that really need it. For example, parents who refuse to give their children needed medicines out of religious reasons should expect to land in jail (as they often do in our legal system).

  • Still alive

    Been feeling a bit nostalgic. Not about to return to LiveJournal - their new ownership is unfortunate, but I wanted to briefly note what's been up…

  • Unplugging LJ

    It's about time I pulled the plug on the LJ version of my blog: 1) I'm much more active on G+ than I am with general blogging. I post many times a…

  • Mutual Trust

    I don't know which should be considered more remarkable: That a cat should trust a member of a far larger and stronger species that it can't…

  • Post a new comment


    Anonymous comments are disabled in this journal

    default userpic

    Your reply will be screened

    Your IP address will be recorded