Pat Gunn (dachte) wrote,
Pat Gunn
dachte

Moral Relatives

I just read the Wikipedia article on Moral Relativism. By their terms, I am meta-ethically relativist, and definitely not a normative relativist (I call this combination 「Strong Moral Relativism」, and normative+meta-ethical relativism 「Weak Moral Relativism」).

I further assert that while logic and reason are appropriate for resolving philosophical/value disputes between people with similar foundations, disputes between people with different value-foundations often can only be argued using aesthetic arguments. We adopt axioms for pragmatic/aesthatic reasons, and only things that depend on them are subject to a convergent, reasoned approach.

I think I still understand moral-objectivist perspectives, as childish as they feel to me nowadays.

Subscribe

  • Typing in Colours

    (Cross-posted to G+, but it's more of a definitive statement of views so it goes here too) A recent instance of 「Wasted Talent」: here I'm not…

  • Loyalty

    This is meant to address three ideas: Don't blame the victim If you care for me, you'd support me unconditionally Safe zonesAnd to be a topic in…

  • What Do We Owe Each Other?

    One of the central questions in political philosophy, or perhaps one of the most intuitive initial framings, is "what do we owe each other?". I…

  • Post a new comment

    Error

    Anonymous comments are disabled in this journal

    default userpic

    Your reply will be screened

    Your IP address will be recorded 

  • 0 comments