Pat Gunn (dachte) wrote,
Pat Gunn
dachte

Moral Relatives

I just read the Wikipedia article on Moral Relativism. By their terms, I am meta-ethically relativist, and definitely not a normative relativist (I call this combination 「Strong Moral Relativism」, and normative+meta-ethical relativism 「Weak Moral Relativism」).

I further assert that while logic and reason are appropriate for resolving philosophical/value disputes between people with similar foundations, disputes between people with different value-foundations often can only be argued using aesthetic arguments. We adopt axioms for pragmatic/aesthatic reasons, and only things that depend on them are subject to a convergent, reasoned approach.

I think I still understand moral-objectivist perspectives, as childish as they feel to me nowadays.

Subscribe

  • Still alive

    Been feeling a bit nostalgic. Not about to return to LiveJournal - their new ownership is unfortunate, but I wanted to briefly note what's been up…

  • Unplugging LJ

    It's about time I pulled the plug on the LJ version of my blog: 1) I'm much more active on G+ than I am with general blogging. I post many times a…

  • Mutual Trust

    I don't know which should be considered more remarkable: That a cat should trust a member of a far larger and stronger species that it can't…

  • Post a new comment

    Error

    Anonymous comments are disabled in this journal

    default userpic

    Your reply will be screened

    Your IP address will be recorded 

  • 0 comments