Pat Gunn (dachte) wrote,
Pat Gunn
dachte

Markov

Courtesy of a Markov-LJ webtoy:

its defaults. I would not mind worse defaults so much, but it took some doing at every step and it is fine to shape markets through regulation, I believe the current Republican policy foci, and often out-of-tune intentionally (which may be the last of the things that I want to really matter to people, and university staff often are a great example. People will die in the "information application for end-users" field. More interesting yet is that there is the longest consecutive amount of time you've spent doing one thing? What was it? View 1140 Answers That's probably coding. I know I have the conclusion enacted/defended/enforced It's a functional conflation, in that I would like to spread. I don't think any of my mind may remain heavily divided, but I'm happy to buy pizza or take a bit undermaintained. Football jerseys. That's not my kind of information ISI's security is otherwise important to me, and hooks into a rounded, open, engaged intellectual citizen." I don't believe deregulation should go beyond removing regulation that serves little purpose, I believe recent campaign finance reform efforts were positive (as many high-profile Republicans did until recently), I believe that various flaws in their natural state (note that my addition of Freud into this is a nuisance that's been giving carte blanche, and we're moving closer to policies that meet our values . Israel is betraying a friend, although I think I've found my next regular hangout (Milkboy Coffee). It's about a year or two. Pakistan and the starting point for political philosophy: (This is an outline for a Palestine are not necessarily the only way to step back into what I believe/hold/have concluded would feel wrong, I think it's natural to want to see private schools and social security Removing regulation of businesses Ending programmes that aim to shape customer behaviour or product availability Gas prices A "realpolitik" foreign policy that uses torture and american weight to directly benefit America's financial interests as well as in a different desktop paradigm won?" than a sequel to the filesystem, both have a serious shot. Even a right-libertarian isn't socially conservative enough to be the parent of a house I designed, something I should commit to paper someday in case that world goes away or I forget entirely what I wanted, but emotionally I still depended on those ties. Thinking rationally, it was unlikely I ever could've made them into what I'm leaving, just like stepping into the ring. First, let's note the clowns. I don't think that's quite it; the core of the person/family organising them. The job of civilisation is to be protected by copyright, instead where there were some open standard of crypto encapsulating each work and moving at the negotiating table, Labour's platform is more compatible with his, and the roles of HaShem and Yeshua in the US to conduct this operation on its soil. The US is, IMO, correct not to say (Trump is a "natural state" of humanity, flowing from human nature, and society is based on making the freedom of already-decent people more regular, not a mechanism to keep their research and expression in line with those sponsors. These deals amount to a few times when I've either been too dogged or not dogged enough in keeping friendships alive, etc. I thought of them as being one party responsible for the future; maybe I've been less-than-thrilled when people take my interface-elements away in successive versions of certain states. Sometimes what the law recognises and what cultures recognise don't line up (someone might be dreamed that would hold together a legal system. Substantially supports many Tea Party positions. Rudy Giuliani - A social conservative, Romney may have changed people's lives is not inherently lovable as Pittsburgh, nor even the best place to figure things out. Also, the problems of philosophy or the unfortunate two-state consensus that permits the continued racism of Israeli policy. The United States have had some rough moments over the details of this doctrine (those that have it). I place no stock in it, as I was well enough to be involved in their governance. Like Locke and Hobbes, I don't blow my introvert social-fuses) is important! Anyhow,

I like Markov chains. The idea is that a set of words from a dictionary are analysed so the corrispondences between a word and its immediate predecessor(s) are recorded. The order of the markov chain describes how many past words form the current state. This is used to build a state machine with weights for each transition. It is easy to design and populate the needed data structures, and pretty easy to use them do something like the above. (pardon this highly informal description)

It'd be more interesting to have rules to reject or rewrite things that are agrammatical (because as we know I have perfect grammar all the time!), but doing that well requires sophisticated natural language processing.

Subscribe

  • Still alive

    Been feeling a bit nostalgic. Not about to return to LiveJournal - their new ownership is unfortunate, but I wanted to briefly note what's been up…

  • Unplugging LJ

    It's about time I pulled the plug on the LJ version of my blog: 1) I'm much more active on G+ than I am with general blogging. I post many times a…

  • Mutual Trust

    I don't know which should be considered more remarkable: That a cat should trust a member of a far larger and stronger species that it can't…

  • Post a new comment

    Error

    Anonymous comments are disabled in this journal

    default userpic

    Your reply will be screened

    Your IP address will be recorded 

  • 4 comments