Pat Gunn (dachte) wrote,
Pat Gunn
dachte

Hierarchies of Implementation

When it comes to general implementation of philosophical ideas in society, and t
heir evaluation, I think of the following chain:

*General description of the idea
*More specific form of the idea, with theory attached
*Legal implementation of the idea
*Institutional enforcement/support of the idea
*Institutional culture for those institutions
*Individual actors within those institutions

Criticism of how society works should, in my opinion, try to be clear which (one or more) of these are being addressed. For example, in the first case, if you're criticising capitalism or socialism, are you criticising its necessary/intrinsic characteristics (the first part of the chain) or its specific form (the second part)? If you're criticising police action, are you criticising a specific policeman, are you criticising what you believe to be a police culture that enables/suggests that kind of action, or are you criticising the basic idea of police?

Clarity on these is important in analysis.
Subscribe
  • Post a new comment

    Error

    Anonymous comments are disabled in this journal

    default userpic

    Your reply will be screened

    Your IP address will be recorded 

  • 0 comments