A bit of other stuff first:
- I don't understand why people use 4Square. I occasionally see crud on twitter like 「I am in a subway $somewhere-thats-816-miles-away-from-you,
and there are 41 people here with me」. I realise that twitter is meant to be a take-it-or-leave-it kind of social medium, but this seems like it's of no possible interest. Well, unless I suppose I were actually in the same city as the person, had a car, and were keen to meet the person but didn't want to call them up on the phone. Is 4Square best for stalkers?
- Some of us are a bit more radically open than others in talking about our troubles on our LJ. I think that's fine; sometimes if one feels isolated it's nice to know that another person knows about one's suffering, and sometimes the sharing of one's inner life can help another person either have a better understanding of the range of human experience/inner life or get tips on how to deal with something. I do think it'd be nice to do two things with this, usually: A) Usually hide in-depth things behind a cut (or cut-equivalent, for whatever blogging platform), both because the other person might not care (and that's okay) and because they might be somewhere public, and B) Try to at least say enough to have actually said something.
- Google Offers on G+ is like getting spam from friends. Cut that shit out.
- I am pleased to see a widening gulf between RonPaul/Libertarians and Occupy. I'm hoping to see the former rejected and demoralised enough that they're never heard from again in American politics.
- Recently got two neat indie games on Steam:
- Sideway - A cute platformer with a hip-hop theme. You're this little guy who has a can of spray paint, fighting paint-based monsters. The game plays around a lot with gravity and camera angles. It also has silly hip-hop playing continually (I haven't heard that much "yo" since intro Spanish class). The rap is oddly purged of swear words but like most rap is degrading to women. The controls take some getting used to too.
- LIMBO - A dark, disturbing, and at some points scary platformer that's somewhere between Super Mario 1 and Lemmings.
A long time ago, when I was a libertarian, I had a lot of conversations with my first girlfriend on ethics. She self-identified as pragmatic and considered me principled, and made a case for pragmatism; that for any principle there is probably a situation where it should probably be ignored. My philosophy has changed a lot since then; I no longer try to build my worldview out of relatively formal axiomatic logic, although it is not entirely astructural. Since that time, there are two major developments:
- I developed my metaphilosophical value-theory (whereby I divide values into moral values, ethical values, pragma values, and preference values, and then construct frameworks for each set of values). Each framework can fall back to its corrisponding set of raw values for situations not already covered. This provides some of the flexibility she has/had with her pragmatism without losing all structure
- I have replaced my absolute faith in logic and dialogue with a pragmatic one. I no longer believe in mathematical or logical truth and no longer believe the best argument is necessarily a path to truth. Instead, I see logic and maths and all other thought as human inventions, adopted pragmatically, adapted pragmatically, and potentially best-of-breed and provider of good betting-odds on any factual claims, but never potentially more.
Other matters for another angle:
- I occasionally see people arguing 「Batman Ethics」 online; given vigilantism, they see Batman's refusal to kill as respectworthy. I cannot condemn this enough; given how often villains in that set of stories escape and continue to kill, I think Batman is performing unethically by continuing to return them alive to the justice system (and often Arkham Asylum) for the nth time. It is inappropriate (and even vile) to show mercy in some circumstances. Granted, none of these circumstances show up in the daily lives of most people in real life (certainly never has happened for me)
- I believe in both Machiavellian virtú and something like classical virtue. What I mean by that is that for those who have or seek power, it is acceptable for them to create a separate set of moral values that are aimed at a more consequentialist moral framework for politics/nations, provided these are in the service of the public good. This alternate moral framework must never be selfish, and it still will restrain some actions, but it will be aimed squarely at what is good for the people and the state, not what is acceptable as the morals of most people. This is the same kind of morals we might imagine someone with a time machine exercising; given such a tool, we might reasonably discard day-to-day morality given what we know of history and kill a child to save millions.
- I've attached the notion of the latter as imposing a status on someone as a "state actor of an unrecognised nation"; when someone takes that kind of political/world-shaping stage, they accept a vulnerability. People with traditional morality will not understand (and might not even accept the notion of virtú as independent from virtue), and there must not be a way of judging their acts, if failed/discovered, as anything but criminal. Just as the American founding fathers, or Kemal Ataturk, or many others took history's reigns in their hands, they likely would've been executed had they failed.