Pat Gunn (dachte) wrote,
Pat Gunn
dachte

Establishing a broken pipe

In our standards of discourse, we don't seem to have a good way to say "I disagree with you on points X, Y, and Z, but I also don't consider them that relevant to the broader context", or "I disagree with you on point W, but it's getting off-topic". I'm not sure if this is a good thing or a bad thing. Fairly often I see people dropping a trail of things that are both irrelevant and wrong in discussions, and if I point out that they're wrong, we're suddenly in a long discussion on that something else.

There's this general expectation among well-behaved debators that they can generally back up what they say, and this tendency that if our statements are challenged, we will do our best to defend them; result: easy derailment. Other result: intentional derailment.

Subscribe

  • Still alive

    Been feeling a bit nostalgic. Not about to return to LiveJournal - their new ownership is unfortunate, but I wanted to briefly note what's been up…

  • Unplugging LJ

    It's about time I pulled the plug on the LJ version of my blog: 1) I'm much more active on G+ than I am with general blogging. I post many times a…

  • Mutual Trust

    I don't know which should be considered more remarkable: That a cat should trust a member of a far larger and stronger species that it can't…

  • Post a new comment

    Error

    Anonymous comments are disabled in this journal

    default userpic

    Your reply will be screened

    Your IP address will be recorded 

  • 0 comments