Pat Gunn (dachte) wrote,
Pat Gunn
dachte

Importance of Circles

One of the most important things about a circle or society for people working on a topic is that it keeps its members honest/careful, using an expectation of criticism for statements that violate the scientific/philosophical/other norms of the community to keep people cautious.

A good scientist or philosopher or historian or practitioner of many other disciplines should welcome well-founded criticism, not be shy of levelling it at even those that share their values, and be prepared for lively discussion in groups for their topics.

This is why academia works. This is why circles of philosophy work, and this is why whenever any community insulates itself from criticism it so quickly rots. Good work *can* come from the lone thinker, but it's rare that a lone thinker can manage that for any length of time.

Subscribe

  • Still alive

    Been feeling a bit nostalgic. Not about to return to LiveJournal - their new ownership is unfortunate, but I wanted to briefly note what's been up…

  • Unplugging LJ

    It's about time I pulled the plug on the LJ version of my blog: 1) I'm much more active on G+ than I am with general blogging. I post many times a…

  • Mutual Trust

    I don't know which should be considered more remarkable: That a cat should trust a member of a far larger and stronger species that it can't…

  • Post a new comment

    Error

    Anonymous comments are disabled in this journal

    default userpic

    Your reply will be screened

    Your IP address will be recorded 

  • 0 comments