The Analytic and Continental traditions in western philosophy are not entirely distinct, nor are either monolithic; while the analytic may stress clarity and structure and the continental with ways of life and foundations, this classification is only an approximation, and one of many that approximates a division is stronger when mapping philosophical genotypes than expressed traits. The analytics have traditionally staked a stronger claim to science; incorrectly, I think, although the relationship between science-as-natural-philosophy and other areas of philosophy have a number of conceptions depending on the subschool of philosophy. I hold that strict materialism and empiricism are compatible with subjectivity and the broad continental programme, and lay out my preferred frameworks in each (without argument, as I think these positions sit on axioms or things near them that are both difficult to unseat and are competing with other theories that are likewise difficult to unseat; except in rare cases one is left making aesthetic arguments between them as each is reasonably consistent).
Science and Philosophy and Free Wont
This is the time where the more materialist of us are giving gifts and the geeky of us are giving GIFs. Instead, I offer you a year's end music mix:…
Weird Al recently released another another album, Alpocalypse. I've always liked his Polka medleys, but not having a TV means I don't hear much of…
Anyone who has played Portal 2 and has a good knowledge of classical music, I have a question (might be spoily for those who have not yet played…
- 0 comments